Richard Fletcher of the Reuters Institute has produced an in-depth analysis of the top reasons people around the world gave for paying for news online.
Fletcher observed that the most common reasons people gave for paying were they wanted access on their mobile devices (30%), they like to consume news from a range of sources (29%), or they were offered a good deal or package (23%).
My take on Fletcher’s data: The message to digital news publishers should be clear: they need to make sure their content displays rapidly and adapts well to the small screen–responsive design. Also, they should be testing various prices and packages for online content to see which ones produce the best returns.
Even Spain’s tightfisted news consumers are paying (in Spanish)
Other top reasons given for paying for digital news suggested that consumers are willing to pay for information that is of high quality, differentiated, and convenient to access:
- My favorite news source does not allow free access, 17%
- It was the only way I could access specialist information 17%
- I like to have access to information that most people do not 17%
- There were benefits from membership other than news access 16%
- It was cheaper than paying for offline access 16%
- News you pay for is better than free news 16%
Publishers should take a page from the Amazon playbook: the retail giant focuses on making the user experience as easy, rewarding, and personalized as possible.
The U.S. grew fastest
Among Fletcher’s other observations: in the U.S., the percentage paying for online news jumped from 9% to 16% in just one year, more than any other country. The reason? Fletcher suggested “a political shock.”
The data showed that much of that growth in the U.S. came from the young and those leaning left on the political spectrum. When asked to give their reasons for paying for news, the U.S. had the most respondents (29%) of all 36 countries who selected the option “I want to help fund journalism”.
An optimistic interpretation for the future of the Fourth Estate could be that the U.S. consumer recognizes the importance of journalism to a healthy democracy.
Related: